Greetings all of you out of the box unconventional thinkers. Today is a day to reevaluate the ideas of a democracy and what our founding fathers had in mind when they authored the guidelines of the constitution. They really did have foresight and wisdom that transcended their time and is still relevant for the times of today.

Lets Discuss The Importance of a Republic…  

So many times in life things start off with the best of intentions and overtime, natural human tendencies rule and the well oiled machine of daily operations erodes. William Golding, author of “Lord of the Flies,” eloquently writes in this book about the natural human instincts of instant gratification and power seeking agendas that is the DNA of mankind’s makeup. The book is about a group of boys who get stranded on a deserted island after crash landing in an airplane that have to live and work together to survive. The beginnings of their attempts to work as a team was the strongest times of organization and structure. As time progressed, the instincts of certain kids started taking over and the satisfaction of the individuals began to overrule the laws and order that were set in place. What had started off at the beginning of the book as a plan to organize and work together began and battle of power, greed, and personal satisfaction through the deteriorating natural occurrences of time. When the opportunity was presented for one group to step on and over the rights and freedoms of the other, the moment was seized.

The founding fathers were very smart and clear on what sort of system our country needed to keep the personal agendas of one group from imposing and taking advantage of another. A republic is a freedom system that is set in place to preserve liberty of the people and give no great amounts of power to any one group of people (including the government).  A republic is a government of law under a Constitution. The Constitution is meant to keep the government in check and prevents the majority (acting through their government) from violating the rights of the individual.  

Keep in mind this is the system that was supposed to be in place.

Under a true republic, the attitude toward property is respect for laws and individual rights, and a sensible economic procedure. What we have seen and experienced over the nation’s most recent deteriorating years is a distancing from the Constitution and a disregard for the predetermined rules that have been put in place for our presidents to honor and protect.

A big misconception that is taught in school and most widely accepted is that America is supposed to be a democracy. What is not taught, however is that the effects of a democracy always ends up being mobocracy. In a democracy, the majority always wins regardless on whether the demand is morally/socially/economically sound.

Under a republic there are a number of safety nets that are in place that anticipate the innate human greed and selfishness that exists and will rule when opportunities exists to step over your neighbor.‘s biggest concern is that America is so far gone from any possibility of restoring the republic. As times get worse and the economy continues to crumble, the demand for more programs and more from Uncle Sam becomes the cry of the mob.  

The fact that these entitlements and programs exist are an abomination to the rights and liberties that are not being protected within the guidelines of the Constitution, and with 50% of the population not paying taxes, we are virtually on the tipping point of the mob voting themselves handouts at the expense of those actually paying taxes.

We included the thoughts of Napolitano as he poses questions on what is a democracy and what it does to a nation.

What If Democracy Is Bunk?

by Andrew Napolitano


What if you are only allowed to vote because it doesn’t make a difference? What if no matter how you vote, the elites get to have it their way? What if “one person, one vote” is just a fiction created by the government to induce your compliance? What if democracy is dangerous to personal freedom? What if democracy erodes the people’s understanding of natural rights and the foundations of government, and instead turns elections into beauty contests?


What if democracy allows the government to do anything it wants, as long as more people bother to show up at the voting booth to support it than to oppose it? What if the purpose of democracy is to convince people that they could prosper not through the creation of wealth but through theft from others? What if the only moral way to acquire wealth – aside from inheritance – is through voluntary economic activity? What if the government persuaded you that you could acquire wealth through political activity? What if economic activity included all the productive and peaceful things we do? What if political activity included all the parasitical and destructive things the government does?


What if governments were originally established to protect people’s freedom, but always turn into political and imperialist enterprises that seek to expand their power, increase their territory and heighten their control of the population? What if the idea that we need a government to take care of us is actually a fiction? What if our strength as individuals and durability as a culture are contingent not on the strength of the government but on the amount of freedom we have from the government?


What if we’re seeing civil unrest around the world precisely because government is out of control? What if the cocktail of big government and democracy brings dependence and destruction? What if big government destroys people’s motivations and democracy convinces them that the only motivation they need is to vote and go along with whatever the government does?


What if the Republican primaries we’re seeing unfold aren’t actually as democratic as they may appear to be? What if the results you have seen from the states that have voted thus far don’t match the composition of the delegates those states send to the Tampa convention this summer because the polls aren’t what counts, but what counts are the secret meetings that come after the voting? What if Joe Stalin was right when he said the most powerful person in the world is the guy who counts the votes?


What if the greatest tyrant in history lives among us? What if that tyrant always gets its way, no matter what the laws are or what the Constitution says? What if that tyrant is the majority of voters? What if the tyranny of the majority in a democracy recognizes no limits on its power?


What if the government misinforms voters so as to justify anything the government wants to do? What if the government bribes people with the money it prints? What if it gives entitlements to the poor, tax breaks to the middle class and bailouts to the rich just to keep all of us dependent upon it? What if a vibrant republic requires not just the democratic process of voting, but also informed and engaged voters who understand first principles of limited government and free-market economics, and the divine origin of natural rights?


What if we could free ourselves from the yoke of big government through a campaign of education and information and personal courage that leads to a revolutionary return to first principles? What if the establishment doesn’t want this? What if the government remains the same no matter who wins elections?

What if because of Ron Paul’s presidential campaign, because he isn’t campaigning just for votes as his competition is, because he is educating the population and winning the hearts and minds of a once free people and inspiring them to fight for their freedom once more, freedom wins? What if we can be free again? What will it take to make that happen?