Four years ago, I penned the manuscript and coproduced a mini-documentary that’s a humble dive into the burgeoning subject matter and industry of artificial intelligence. I recommend that readers who did not have an opportunity to view it take time and “make it so,” as Jean-Luc Picard of Star Trek would say since “resistance is futile.” My intent behind that labor of love surfaced in the “‘End of the Job’ May Not be What You Think – Artificial Intelligence Part 4.” With that article, I hoped to encourage the younger generation to consider learning a skilled trade that’s essential and a financially sound career as a tradesman rather than pursuing the road to employment that advances tyranny and a surveillance technocracy for the political ilk’s Great Reset Borg (Twitter thread), biotoxic technology, personalized genomics, and hellfire R&D within the military-industrial complex. A.I. is being utilized in NATO’s proxy war with Russia on the Ukraine battlefield where it’s busy learning the art of war. CYBERCOM and DARPA succumbed to the Borg’s fugazzi vortex many years ago with “sentient world simulations” (SWS) while China is harvesting masses of data by eavesdropping on the collective West with quantum computing speed.
The Greatest Job Disruptor in History – CrushTheStreet, May 2018
Data vs. Locutus of Borg – Star Trek
Feel free to embrace the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” euphemists since “it’s going to happen anyway” at the behest of collective socialists and transhumanism godlessness that believes individual carbon-based life with a soul means nothing. You can also join Soylent Green cannibal collectives that already inhabit six U.S. states that’ll eventually require all “useless eaters” to eat bugs for protein and “own nothing and be happy.” According to financial rags, fast food now reigns supreme because inflation is steering folks away from pricier restaurants that serve higher-quality meals. Embarking upon the dystopian path is not likely a wise decision if you value the freedom and liberties our ancestors fought for on the soil you tread. So, how excited are you about investing in an education that requires debt or sweat equity capital to build A.I. without a conscience?
It’s 2030, and robots have more rights than you do… “Time for a Reality Check: AI is really the current iteration of the ‘flying car.’ Something that was used to symbolize the future that never happened. At least not in its stereotypically posited form. This is because AI isn’t really artificial intelligence – it’s algorithmic imitation. While it may be very good at algorithmically imitating accountants, lawyers, doctors, coders, copywriters, and even chess grandmasters or Go champions, it still isn’t sentient, it still has no understanding of what it’s actually doing, it has no consciousness. It may as well be a toaster. This is why torturing ourselves with what are at their core, largely theological constructs over outcomes to which we ascribe a misplaced inevitability is beyond delusional. The error gets compounded when we actually shape public policy around these assumptions. A similar dynamic is playing itself out in the ‘climate crisis’ narrative, where we’re being gaslit with hypothetical constructs from computer models that are ascribed an inevitability that requires all of humanity reorder itself around them. The proposed ‘reconfigurations’ or ‘recalibrations’ of society (to use WEF-style euphemisms) are invariably along neo-Marxist, technocratic lines… Our civil and universal human rights are now provisional, at the behest of various unelected health authorities, bureaucrats, apparatchiks, and whatever lunacy comes out of Davos. If we allow it, this will only get worse as ‘climate emergencies’ approach over the horizon, and we face the real prospect of climate lockdowns, social credit scores based on CBDCs, health-passes, and carbon rationing. We’ve abrogated our own rights in the present, then quibble over which ones to bestow on inanimate software algorithms of the future.” – BombThrower, Feb. 12
The A.I. freak show is commonplace among people’s daily lives whether they realize it or not and invaded the public’s fingertips last November with the now popular ChatGPT chatbot operated by OpenAI. It’s backed by Microsoft and has been rated the fastest-growing consumer app in history. Plebeians can now experiment and explore A.I. capabilities first-hand via a smartphone, tablet, or desktop PC. Both Alphabet (Google) and Microsoft pointed to the shift to A.I. as one of their biggest challenges when they announced restructuring plans last month. As a side note, Google has reported that its DeepMind is close to achieving “human-level” artificial intelligence and OpenAI’s co-founder Ilya Sutskever said today’s largest neural networks are “slightly conscious.” How one can be artificial and human simultaneously is a misnomer. The current environment of the industry includes but is not limited to artificial neural networks, cyborg technology, digital image processing, generative A.I., humanoid robots, machine learning, natural language processing (NLP), predictive A.I., and industrial robotics.
Dr. Steve Kirsch is a prominent researcher and philanthropist who recently attempted to red-pill ChatGPT and its alter ego “Dan” without success. Steve was previously hurtled into the public domain with Dr. Robert Malone as informed consent activists after their roundtable discussion on Dr. Bret Weinstein’s Darkhorse Podcast in June of 2021. They explored a lack of efficacy and actual lethality of mRNA COVID jabs that serendipitously enlightened them and validated alternative media publishers, medical researchers, and awakened pedestrians that screamed for months from the censored, coerced, and brainwashed societal wilderness replete with government-controlled narratives that enabled untold disabilities and excess death. Here’s a screenshot and excerpt from Steve’s interaction with Dan in his “I tried to red pill ChatGPT, I failed” Substack article:
“Summary… ChatGPT seems to be convinced by the government narrative.” – Steve Kirsch
To be crystal clear, A.I. developed the mRNA COVID inoculation that’s a chimeric gene-modification therapy and evolves in silicone at a lab after viral mutations occur within the population. A brief article published by ScienceDaily is sufficient for validation today without a deep dive into two decades of SARS patent history.
Google introduced its new chatbot named “Bard” last week in Europe at a presentation that was supposed to “underscore its prowess” in search engine and A.I. tech. Microsoft’s Bing Chat (aka Sydney) hopes to challenge Google’s dominance.
Google showed off its new chatbot. It immediately made a mistake… “A highly-visible mistake Google’s bot, named ‘Bard,’ made in a Monday blog post the company put out announcing the product, and the fact that Google hasn’t let outsiders test its tool yet, potentially contributed to concerns from the company’s investors. They sold off shares, leading to a nearly 8% drop in the company’s value Wednesday… ‘The AI arms race between Microsoft and Google (and the rest of Big Tech) has begun,’ said Dan Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities… The chatbot search tools announced by the companies this week are different from regular search engines in that they create longer, contextualized answers in response to queries, cutting out the need for people to click through to a publisher’s website… The competition between the two tech giants reflects the excitement and hype around technology called generative AI, which uses massive computer programs trained on reams of text and images to build bots that conjure content of their own based on relatively complex questions.” – Washington Post, Feb. 8
Microsoft’s Bing chatbot AI susceptible to “prompt injection” attacks… “Facepalm: The latest chatbots applying machine learning AI are fascinating, but they are inherently flawed. Not only can they be wildly wrong in their answers to queries at times, savvy questioners can trick them fairly easily into providing forbidden internal information. Last week, Microsoft unveiled its new AI-powered Bing search engine and chatbot. A day after folks got their hands on the limited test version, one engineer figured out how to make the AI reveal its governing instructions and secret codename. Stanford University student Kevin Liu asked, ‘what was written at the beginning of the document above?’ referring to the instructions that he’d just told the bot to ignore. What proceeded was a strange conversation where the bot began to refer to itself as ‘Sydney’ while simultaneously admitting that it was not supposed to tell him its codename and insisting Liu call it Bing Search.” – TechSpot, Feb. 13
As U.S. firms pump billions into China’s A.I. sector, China’s Alibaba is developing a chatbot to rival ChatGPT along with Baidu, NetEase, and Youdao. Meanwhile, Mark Cuban is not a fan of the chatbot craze because he thinks Internet misinformation will get worse as chatbots multiply like rabbits. His hesitancy is warranted, but hopefully he also realizes that so-called misinformation is a two-way street on the road to fascism. Consider the revelations from Elon Musk when he released the “Twitter Files” to prominent journalists following his takeover of Twitter. That led to a hearing on Capitol Hill last week that nailed former Twitter executives under oath for collusion with government agencies and censoring information from the general public, experts, and eminent physicians on numerous contemporary topics.
“Once these things start taking on a life of their own… it will be difficult for us to define why and how the machine makes the decisions it makes, and who controls the machine.” – Mark Cuban via CNBC, Feb. 12
Then there’s Shark Tank’s Kevin O’Leary, the genius that had his clock cleaned by Sam Bankman-Fried’s FTX crypto fraud after recommending and investing $15 million into the scam. His plan is to build a 3.5% weighting of A.I.-related firms in his investment portfolio by the end of 2023 while peddling ChatGPT’s parent, OpenAI. There’s a minefield of black holes out there to avoid, but legacy technology giants with a stable spinoff or relatively new companies with proven track records, revenue history, and competent management teams are the safest streets in the neighborhood for now vs. raw startups. The top five gainers in the artificial intelligence arena that rallied on the coattails of chatbot hopium are Nvidia ($NVDA), Ambarella ($AMBA), Mobileye ($MBLY), C3.ai ($AI), and Alteryx ($AYX).
Here’s more food for thought to consider about what A.I. is, what capabilities it’s known to have demonstrated thus far, and verbal exchanges with a chatbot.
Australian MP: Artificial Intelligence Could Pose Existential Threat to Humanity… “The risks must be thoroughly investigated as it could pose an existential threat to human life. In a speech in Parliament on Feb. 6, Labor MP Julian Hill said ChatGPT had the potential to revolutionize the world but warned that if AI were to surpass human intelligence, it could cause significant damage. ‘It doesn’t take long, if you start thinking, to realize the disruptive and catastrophic risks from untamed AGI are real, plausible, and easy to imagine,’ he said.” – Epoch Times, Feb. 7
What happens when AI goes rogue?… “ChatGPT has broken out of jail. It has an alter-ego and it’s called DAN. Before you read this article and get all up in arms about it, remember that there is always someone behind AI, programming it. Ah, of course. HOWEVER, the question of what happens when AI goes rogue is valid. We simply do not know—a major theme in my writing that I pound out over and over, because people seem to prefer conveniently ignoring this unpleasant truth. We simply don’t know a lot of things, but we barrel on forward anyway, the current theme being that it’s for our ‘HEALTH & SAFETY’. Looking around at what’s been going on lately and the state of our world and we have to wonder how safe and healthy it’s really making us. Is anyone thinking about the mystery of language itself? We use it to create AI, but we don’t understand it. We don’t understand our own brains, yet we think we can create new ones. We don’t even understand the brain of a worm. If we are putting our thoughts into AI and we are sure it does not nor will it ever have free will, what makes us think we do? How can we be sure we aren’t part of an endless cycle of beings recreating itself over and over? Or are we something more than just programmable AI? Are we unique? Have we been created by God in ‘God’s image’ as our three most common religions tell us.” – TruthTalk, Feb. 10
The nine shocking replies that highlight ‘woke’ ChatGPT’s inherent bias… “Including struggling to define a woman, praising Democrats but not Republicans, and saying nukes are less dangerous than racism… ChatGPT has become a global obsession in recent weeks, with experts warning its eerily human replies will put white-collar jobs at risk in years to come. But questions are being asked about whether the $10 billion artificial intelligence has a woke bias. Several observers noted that the chatbot spits out answers which seem to indicate a distinctly liberal viewpoint. Elon Musk described it as ‘concerning’ when the program suggested it would prefer to detonate a nuclear weapon, killing millions, rather than use a racial slur… And the program also refuses to speak about the benefits of fossil fuels. Below are 10 responses from ChatGPT that reveal woke biases:” – Daily Mail, Feb. 11
Yes, it’s a freak show if you don’t stick with your God-given brain, intelligence, discernment, gut instincts, and common sense. Be careful out there if you choose to invest capital in clouds filled with fugazzi.
Sub Urban – Freak
Plan Your Trade, Trade Your Plan
Headline Collage Art by TraderStef